We might want to ask ourselves
> if we spend more time looking for "sexy" science that grabs the attention
> of the politicians and the public instead of plodding through issues that
> may be less sensational but far more scholarly. > Karen Wegner

> Sure, sensationalism is lot more attractive and exiting for some than
boring
> collecting & analysing facts and making conclusion - a process called
> science>
> Victor Gomelyuk

I think you may have misunderstood my comments. Debbie posted her theory,
and openly asked for scientific feedback. Many people took the time to
produce considered and respectful responses. I believe that this sort of
interchange is useful.

Karen Uldall-Ekman
[log in to unmask]

><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
       To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to:
        mailto:[log in to unmask]
   Web page at http://segate.sunet.se/archives/fish-sci.html
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>