In the last week, two different people have asked me about the effects of the spate of fibreoptic cables that are being laid across the world's oceans -- those same cables through which most readers of this message will have received it. As the Information Age continues, more and more of these cables are being laid without, so far as I can tell, any opportunities for the fishing industry to comment.
The effects of these cables on access to fishing grounds is obvious enough: The cable companies take a very dim view of their expensive cables being caught by an otter board or a clam dredge, so any cable creates a narrow "closed area" along its track. Meanwhile, the landward ends of each cable are trenched into the seabed, with clear (if very local) effects on the benthic environment.
I am left wondering whether these cables have any other effects on the marine environment (and hence on the fisheries). I assume that their outer surfaces are non-toxic but does anyone know for sure? There is presumably some risk of whale entanglements during the laying of the cables (and for some whales also after they are on the bottom), along with some temporary obstruction to fishing activities. But is that all? Are fibreoptic cables harmless, save for their tendency to exclude certain types of bottom fishing from their immediate vicinities?
Trevor Kenchington
-- Trevor J. Kenchington PhD [log in to unmask] Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250 R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251 Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555
Science Serving the Fisheries http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] Need help? Contact [log in to unmask] ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
|