LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave FISH-SCI
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Re: Stock Assessment models


Shareef Siddeek <[log in to unmask]>


Scientific forum on fish and fisheries <[log in to unmask]>


Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:37:49 -0800





text/plain (1 lines) , shareef_siddeek.vcf (1 lines)

Trevor Kenchington wrote:

Pauly's equations (assuming those are the ones you mean) have come
in for their share of criticism but they do seem to work -- for teleosts.

Yes, I was referring to his equation when I mentioned about its application to
a number of tropical fish and invertebrates. I have also used this equation
for a number of fish species. You are correct that it is not appropriate to
use the same relationship between length, growth coefficient and mortality
rate to non teleosts. This has been mentioned in the FAO tropical fish stock
assessment manual as well.

My question is not directly related to the use and misuse of this equation.
But the underlying principle behind this and other length based models which
makes one to think that vital parameters (here it is natural mortality) are
length dependent. When one faced with modeling hard to age animals (e.g.,
shrimp, lobster, crab, etc.), one of his concerns will be how to incorporate
natural mortality and other vital parameter sub-models into the main
length-based model. Should he use a direct length dependent sub model or an
age dependent (and then he may convert into a length dependent model using a
growth function) sub model?

Shareef Siddeek

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main FISH-SCI Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager