-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- --On Monday, November 25, 2002 16:59:26 +0100 John Angelmo
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ah sorry, perhaps it was a bad description from my side. Yes, this is a
> case of "Pop before SMTP", my thought was that this might cause more
> trouble since regular users now adds their own SMTP servers that might
> not be as secure as a server located at an ISP then spammers could use
> those instead.
> I see the pop before smtp solution here more as a future problem
Ah. I see. Sometimes, I type before I think, and with the recent stream of
stupidities from certain providers wrt port filtering I, in addition, tend
to shoot first and ask questions later.
When will I grow up? My apologies to all.
Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE
We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (OpenBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----