><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> If you reply to this message, it will go to all FISH-SCI members. ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Does anyone out in Fish-Sci land know of anyone conducting or who plans on conducting research on the two dam removals on the Penobscot River in Maine scheduled for 2007? I'm looking for a PhD opportunity looking at the ecological effects of these dam removals.
Thanks in advance,
Joe
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> Joseph Schwartz Pollution Control Coordinator City of Carrollton 972-466-3533 [log in to unmask] ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
-----Original Message----- From: Scientific forum on fish and fisheries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Alberto Murta Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:40 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: fisheries data analysis
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> If you reply to this message, it will go to all FISH-SCI members. ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 13:32, you wrote: > > I'm definitely no salesman for SPSS but it can also cope with more than one > dependent variable (multivariate GLM). Do be cautious however, that the > data (the dependent variable,s) approximates a normal distribution (check > it), though you can transform it or apply a weighted least squares weight > which might help, though won't work miracles.
Generalized linear models were developed precisely for data that does _not_ follow a Normal distribution (such as Poisson, or binomial)
> > Only factors (categories) are compared as interactions (a, b, a*b etc) so > it may be better having the data in this form rather than as co-variables, > though you might loose precision.
If a variable is continuous (not a factor), then should be treated as such
>SPSS has a bewildering array of outputs > but an important test is the homogeneity test (Levene's test of equality of > error variance). If P < 0.05 then the model is invalid and you'll have to > reassess your list of factors and co-variables. GLM is a parametric test > and the usual assumptions of these must be employed. > > Post hoc testing should be done to check the form that significant > interactions take. I usually do this by a suitable test between the > dependent variable and the factor (anova etc) or co-variable (regression) > responsible. These post hoc test have their own assumptions which you must > note, too. > > Finally: > GLM is a very powerful tool which can cope with a wide variety of data > types, though the initial model must be valid. >
Your message is full of misunderstandings about GLM. I strongly advise you to stop using SPSS and use R instead (and read a good introductory book on GLM, such as Dobson, A. J. (1990) An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall.) The problem of software like SPSS is that it seems so easy to do everything, that people never realise what they know (or don't know). Software like R is more demanding about the theoretical knowledge of the user.
> Stephen Cotterell > > -Stephen Cotterell > -Rm 4, 22 Portland Square > -School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Science > -University of Plymouth > -Drake Circus > -PLYMOUTH > -PL4 8AA > -T: +44 (0) 1752 232411 > -F: +44 (0) 1752 232406 > -E: [log in to unmask] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scientific forum on fish and fisheries > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Antonio Olinto > Sent: 22 June 2004 12:52 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: fisheries data analysis > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > If you reply to this message, it will go to all FISH-SCI members. > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > Dear Abad, > > Another statistic tool to access the magnitude of the effects of your > variables is the analysis of deviance, given in the generalized linear > models. In GLM you can use both category and continuous data, and also you > can choose distributions other than gaussian, like gamma. > > There's an example in Quinn & Deriso 1999 (Quantitative Fish Dymamics). See > pages 18 to 25. They check the effects of year, area and depth on CPUE. You > can do the same with shell height. In the example they use normal > distribution, log link function and all variables are categories. Depending > on your data, you can improve this. > > I use the program R (www.r-project.org), it's a freeware and runs on > different plataforms. If you want I can send you a pdf demostrating how to > solve Quinn & Deriso's example in R. > > Best regards, > > Antonio Olinto Avila da Silva > Sao Paulo Fisheries Institute > Brazil > > Citando Antonio Hervas Abad <[log in to unmask]>: > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > > > If you reply to this message, it will go to all FISH-SCI members. > > > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > > > I'm working with scallop (pecten maximus) stock assessment in Ireland. > > One of the stock assessment procedures that i am carrying on is a > > sampling programm from the landings. Shell height is recoreded from each > > landing. After several measurements from differents vessels, differents > > fishing areas and different time of the year i want to study the effect > > of vessels, season and location, on the scallop size structure obtained > > from the sampling. I understand that analysis of variance (ANOVA or > > MANOVA) is the method to use for this study but maybe some of you has > > experience working with similars studies and can advice to me of which > > statistic analysis is the more suitable. > > > > Thanks very much > > > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > > > To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to: > > mailto:[log in to unmask] > > For information send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask] > > > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > ------------------------------------------------- > WebMail Bignet - O seu provedor do litoral > www.bignet.com.br > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > For information send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask] > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> > > To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > For information send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask] > > ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
-- Alberto G. Murta Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (INIAP-IPIMAR) Av. Brasilia, 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal | Phone: +351 213027062 Fax:+351 213015948 | http://ipimar-iniap.ipimar.pt/pelagicos/
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] For information send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask] ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] For information send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask] ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
|