i have looked at the tsunami protocol, aparent results are sure aggressive, am
afraid too aggressive and unfair to anyother traffic on the link. would this
do for evlbi, isnt there other traffic using the same link???
well i will be at JIVE tomorrow and thursday
On Thursday 07 April 2005 16:50, you wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:49:10 +0100
> From: Toby Rodwell <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Arpad Szomoru <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: [log in to unmask], Paul Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Overview of eVLBI paths through GEANT
> Immediate new version! (Just got some more info via Paul).
> Arpad Szomoru wrote:
> > Ah, that looks pretty impressive. Thanks Toby, I'll forward it to the
> > stations.
> > --Arpad
> > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Toby Rodwell wrote:
> > > Hi Arpad,
> > > Attached is a PDF showing my first draft for a diagram of the eVLBI
> > > topology.
> > > Please forward it to whoever else you think would like it, or indeed
> > > might be
> > > able to spot errors and offer to fill in the missing parts.
> > > Nothing about the diagram suggests a problem with the basic topology or
> > > link
> > > loading, but I hope it will help people (and especailly the network
> > > community)
> > > when they are contemplating the problem, or thinking what tests are
> > > worth running.
> > > As you can see, I've already copied in thePERT discussion group adn
> > > Paul, who
> > > i know will be interested in seeing it.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Toby
> Toby Rodwell
> Network Engineer
> DANTE - www.dante.net
> Tel: +44 (0)1223 371 300
> Fax: +44 (0)1223 371 371
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> PGP Key ID: 0xB864694E
> City House, 126-130 Hills Road
> Cambridge CB2 1PQ