|
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
If you reply to this message, it will go to all FISH-SCI members.
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
An article titled, "Scallops overfished for past 2 years, official says",
appeared on the front page of today's New Bedford Standard Times.
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/05-05/05-26-05/a01lo102.htm
There was one excerpt in it which gave me pause...
===============================
"Overfishing is a legal term, not a scientific term, and is therefore not an
accurate way to evaluate the health of the scallop fishery, Dr. Kenchington
said."
===============================
As I roughly understand things, "overfishing" is defined as a point beyond
which harvest/mortality levels exceed sustainable levels in a fishery. It
is further my understanding that the thresholds for sustainability are
arrived at scientifically. If this is true, then isn't overfishing truly a
scientific term? More importantly, is it a reasonably accurate way to
evaluate the health of a fishery?
Thanks,
Mike Flaherty
Wareham, MA
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
To leave the Fish-Sci list, Send blank message to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
Vacation? send SET FISH-SCI NOMAIL to [log in to unmask]
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
|
