LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for FISH-SCI Archives


FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave FISH-SCI
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: Small fish sampling methods
From: frederic hartog <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Scientific forum on fish and fisheries <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:08:23 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)


Hi mark,

 

I frequently use a small beam trawl like the third model in the article and caught many three-spine stickleback and other small fish with it in different types of habitat. It is easy to use from a relatively small boat.

 

Estuaries Vol. 15, No. 3, p. 360-367 September 1992
Comparison of Beam Trawls for Sampling
Macrofauna of Posidonia Seagrass
S. E. McNEIL[.
J. D. BELL
Fisheries Research Institute
New South Wales Fisheries
P.O. Box 21
Cronulla, New South Wales 2230
Australia

 

 

Fred


 
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:35:18 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Small fish sampling methods
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> Mark Ravinet wrote:
> > Dear Fish-SCI
> >
> > I am a relatively new PhD student looking at the ecology and evolution 
> > of the three-spine stickleback in Ireland. I am currently 
> > planning/assessing my methodology for sampling and I was wondering if 
> > anyone could suggest some references?
> >
> > I've found several good papers on comparisons of fish sampling methods 
> > but a lot of these concentrate on larger fish. If anyone could point 
> > me in the direction of older or more obscure references dealing with 
> > small fish or with sticklebacks specifically that I might have missed, 
> > I would be very grateful indeed!
> >
> > I should be clear that I am keen that my current planned sampling of 
> > rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal marine habitats requires 
> > relatively small numbers of individuals (30-40). Regardless, I would 
> > like my samples to be as representative possible and I am keen to find 
> > out just how representative the current accepted methods for 
> > stickleback sampling (pond-netting and minnow traps) are.
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Mark Ravinet
> > ------------------------------
> > Mark Ravinet
> > PhD Student
> > School of Biological Sciences
> > Queen's University Belfast
> > Medical Biology Centre
> > Lisburn Road
> > Belfast
> > BT9 7BL
> > Tel:02890972103
> > Mob: 07841675863
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
> > ------------------------------
> Hi Mark,
> 
> There's a nice manual about "Sampling methods applied to fisheries 
> science" written by Cadima and others and published in FAO, check 
> http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0198e/a0198e00.htm
> 
> EJ

_________________________________________________________________
Reunite with the people closest to you, chat face to face with Messenger.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9650736

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main FISH-SCI Page

Permalink



LISTSRV.NORDU.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager