LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for FISH-SCI Archives


FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave FISH-SCI
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Plastics and rubbish drowning Greek ecosystems]
From: "Nils E. Stolpe" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Scientific forum on fish and fisheries <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Fri, 3 Oct 2014 10:02:52 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (115 lines)


><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>
           REPLIES WILL BE SENT TO THE FISH-SCI LIST
<><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><

Hi Trevor -

Good to hear from you, it's been to long. I hope you are doing well.

As you know, I almost always keep what I write far away from this list. 
However, in this instance Magnus asked a question which I replied to 
with a possible answer. I wasn't attempting any grandstanding or 
proselytizing or campaigning. Were that the case, I'd have probably used 
a bit more than a few dozen words.

But, as your well-considered response illustrates, it did spark a bit of 
discussion (and hopefully a bit of thought as well).

Thanks very much,
Nils



On 10/3/2014 9:19 AM, Trevor Kenchington wrote:
>> <>  ><>  ><> ><>  ><>  ><>  ><> ><>  ><>  ><>  ><> ><>  ><>
>           REPLIES WILL BE SENT TO THE FISH-SCI LIST
> <><  <><  <><  <>< <><  <><  <><  <>< <><  <><  <><  <>< <><
>
> Nils,
>
> As an old friend, I should remind you that this is a mailing list for 
> discussion of the science of fish and fisheries. I fully endorse your 
> campaign against the policy distortions generated by foundation 
> funding of an anti-fishing message but that campaign does not belong 
> here.
>
> If we can stretch the remit of this list to include the 
> social-scientific study of the general public's responses to fisheries 
> issues, then I would have to say that the money is only part of the 
> story. We should also ask why it gets spent disproportionately on 
> anti-fishing, rather than anti-plastics, messages. I will guess at two 
> possible answers:
>
> 1: Human beings are very good at finding reasons why their problems 
> are not of their own making. (It's a behaviour pattern all too common 
> amongst fishermen, to the detriment of fisheries management.) Since 
> nearly all of us use and discard plastics, we (at least: the great 
> majority of us) have to focus on some other cause for the changes to 
> ocean ecosystems that we do not desire. An ENGO which spent its money 
> telling people that they will see the cause best by looking in a 
> mirror would not get much of a hearing. Demonizing the tiny proportion 
> of the population that is involved in commercial fishing is a whole 
> lot easier.
>
> 2: In the world we have all built together, large corporations carry 
> great power. Too often, public interests only move forward when some 
> corporation can make money from that advance. There are very large 
> companies involved in the manufacture of plastics and others that make 
> free use of those products in discardable packaging. While there are a 
> few moderately large corporations involved in the seafood business, 
> there are no really big ones. I'm not going to suggest that some 
> petrochemical company has had lawyers warn off the ENGOs. Corporate 
> power is usually far more subtle than that. But I will posit that the 
> lack of any giant fishing corporations has made it possible for 
> certain foundation-funded ENGOs to maintain their attack on commercial 
> fishing over two decades without any effective riposte.
>
>
> I do not know whether anyone has tested such hypotheses through actual 
> research. They are far outside my area of expertise. But a rationale 
> or "scientific" approach to the problem might reveal much more than 
> simply "following the money" can.
>
>
> Keep up the good fight ... though perhaps not through this medium!
>
>
> Trevor Kenchington
>
>
>
> On 2-Oct-14, at 9:30 AM, Nils E. Stolpe wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/2014 5:48 AM, Magnus Johnson wrote:
>>> I don't quite understand why this doesn't get more press.
>> Hi Magnus -
>>
>> I suspect it's because, unlike fishing, there aren't any 
>> multi-billion dollar industry connected "charitable" foundations 
>> telling reporters, producers, pols and the general public that 
>> plastics pollution is a serious threat to the world's oceans.
>>
>> Best,
>> Nils
>
>> <>  ><>  ><> ><>  ><>  ><>  ><> ><>  ><>  ><>  ><> ><>  ><>
> For information, send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask]
>
>                   The FISH-SCI List Archive
>         http://segate.sunet.se/cgi-bin/wa?A0=FISH-SCI
>
>     To cancel your subscription, send a blank message to:
>           [log in to unmask]
> <><  <><  <><  <>< <><  <><  <><  <>< <><  <><  <><  <>< <><
>
>

><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>
For information, send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask]

                   The FISH-SCI List Archive
         http://segate.sunet.se/cgi-bin/wa?A0=FISH-SCI

     To cancel your subscription, send a blank message to:
           [log in to unmask]
<><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main FISH-SCI Page

Permalink



LISTSRV.NORDU.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager