|
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
REPLIES WILL BE SENT TO THE FISH-SCI LIST
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
Ray Kinney wrote, in response to an earlier posting of mine:
> Not a fishsci issue????
There are issues and then there are modes of approaching those issues.
Of course plastics pollution in aquatic environments is an
appropriate issue for Fish-Sci. Perhaps not all members would agree
but I think that the processes by which the general public form
opinions about marine pollution are also fair game for a list that
discusses the science of fisheries.
To be science, however, the discussion should focus on rational,
dispassionate reasoning from empirical evidence. Maintaining that
standard while exploring the means by which policy choices are made
can get very difficult but, if we don't try hard, I fear that the
essential character of this list will be lost amidst agenda-driven
rants. I think that my previous posting put my toes very near the
line and perhaps over it. I figured I should start with a warning,
lest I provoke others to take a discussion far beyond the bounds of
science.
Trevor Kenchington
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
For information, send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask]
The FISH-SCI List Archive
http://segate.sunet.se/cgi-bin/wa?A0=FISH-SCI
To cancel your subscription, send a blank message to:
[log in to unmask]
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
|
