><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>
           REPLIES WILL BE SENT TO THE FISH-SCI LIST
<><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><

Folks

A quick question. In many climate change projections, temperature changes are reported in °C shift from baseline, while precipitation (or discharge) is provided in % terms.

What are peoples' thoughts regarding presenting temperature change as a % - as a means of highlighting those areas where changes are going to be large (e.g. Arctic). I appreciate that giving a °C value allows estimated of effects on vital rates  etc.

Cheers
Chris


><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Professor Chris Harrod
(Fish & Aquatic Ecology)

Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Twitter: @chris_harrod
www.harrodlab.net<http://www.harrodlab.net>
HarrodLab: Fish and Stable Isotope Ecology Laboratory
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales Alexander von Humboldt,
Universidad de Antofagasta,
Avenida Angamos 601, Antofagasta, Chile
Chile Mobile: +56 9 7399 7792
Chile Office: +56 55 2637400
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><


><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>
For information, send INFO FISH-SCI to [log in to unmask]

                   The FISH-SCI List Archive
         http://segate.sunet.se/cgi-bin/wa?A0=FISH-SCI

     To cancel your subscription, send a blank message to:
           [log in to unmask]
<><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><