LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave FISH-SCI
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Referees and...


Howard Teas <[log in to unmask]>


Academic forum on fisheries ecology and related topics <[log in to unmask]>


Mon, 9 Jun 1997 10:03:15 -0700





text/plain (1 lines)

to the Referrees discussions

There does seem to be a problem with too many papers (re: R G Dudley).
However, I dno't necessarily agree that splitting papers is the problem.
It is the problem if the papers were split in order to increase a
publication list. Splitting papers can also be very useful. A manuscript
I have on the effects of the EXXON Valdez oil spill on eelgrass is, to my
way of thinking, a separate paper than the descriptive manuscript on
general conditions within eelgrass beds in the Sound. The two are for
distinct audiences.

The problem, at least to me, is the publication of papers whtiout
significance, whether they should be part of a larger paper, or whether
they stand alone. Examples are papers without a sound thesis (no
direction), those with no replication, and those with no conclusion.

Fager suggested some years ago that there should be a separate category of
journals for data papers. Using the internet may be the solution to what
he saw, and we are in need of. Repositories for data would be available,
and the publications would be for science.

It is obvious that researchers are presently judged by their pub list..
That seems to be a problem for all of us, not just the jornal editors.
Data reports in therepositories could then be used as a category in CVs

Regards, Howard Teas

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main FISH-SCI Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager