LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for FISH-SCI Archives


FISH-SCI Archives

FISH-SCI Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave FISH-SCI
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject:

Help with fish toxicity problem -Reply -Forwarded

From:

FRANK MCCORMICK <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Academic forum on fisheries ecology and related topics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 20 Aug 1997 08:33:56 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)


This message was bounced by the listserve so I am forwarding my
colleague's response. F. McCormick

>>
Hi

My office mate and colleage Frank McCormick forwarded your message
to me. Our opinion is that your problem is not a pathogen because the
response is to quick. My thoughts are as follows:

Things that fatheads are more sensitive to than Ceriodaphnia are:

a) H2S - your TIE should have elliminated it if you used the aeration step

b) Nitrogen gas posioning - your TIE should have elliminated this with the
aeration step as well.

c) Diazon - your C18 step should have indicated whether this was a
problem.

d) polymers - certain polymers may effect fish and not Ceriodaphs and
would be filtered out by the 0.45 micron filter.

e) the mode of toxic response seems to indicate a narcotic effect.

Hope this helps.

jim


Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main FISH-SCI Page

Permalink



LISTSRV.NORDU.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager