LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for MHTML Archives

MHTML Archives

MHTML Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave MHTML
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: More on wrongly(?) formatted urls
From: Jacob Palme <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:IETF working group on HTML in e-mail <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Aug 1997 15:51:00 +0100

text/plain (16 lines)

At 11.25 +0100 97-08-26, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> RFC 1738 describes how to encode URLs. Clearly, if we only encounter URLs
> in text/html objects that are RFC 1738 compliant we have no problem as they
> will also be RFC 822 header syntax compliant. The problem arises when we
> encounter URLs that are not RFC 1738 compliant and which, therefore, may
> not be RFC 822 header syntax compliant. This then is the case, and the only
> case, in which 2047 encoding is required.

That is a little vague to write in a standard. I would prefer to say that
all URLs which are not RFC 1738 compliant MUST be encoded with RFC 2047
encoding. That is, that we should not specify our own definition of which
character codes need and need not 2047 encoding.

Jacob Palme <[log in to unmask]> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL:

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main MHTML Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager