The only work item on our plate at this time is the INFORMATONAL RFC
that Jacob is working on, and which continues to receive minimal
comment from anyone at any time.
Or, perhaps it is a good time to get the implementors together to
discuss the issues of Content Interoperability using MHTML that arise
from current experince with fielded MHTML products and from
Now is the time to decide what MHTML WG wants to do in Chicago.
We should not ask for a session slot unless we really have some work
to do that cannot be done (perhaps better) over the net. Slots are
scarce for critical work.
BTW, I believe the MHTML should be considered to be both a WEB and
MESSAGE type of WG, given that it puts web ojects in messages;-)...
So, if we have a slot, it should not collide with other web or message
------- Forwarded Message
From: Patrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: Keith Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Apps track in Chicago
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 09:48:08 +0200
Keith and I are compiling the apps track in Chicago. These are the special
issues for chicago:
(1) There will be an open apps area meeting monday morning. Be there!
(2) Keith and I will have two special meetings. One about E.164 phone
numbers, their use, resolution etc on the Internet. One about Name ->
Capability mapping. Notable is that the Transport Area will have a meeting
about IN signalling on the Internet. We will try to schedule these three
meetings back to back.
(3) Tuesday will be one-hour slots!
(4) The apps wg chair evening will be thursday like last time.
(5) Social will be tuesday evening.
(6) Open IAB etc etc will be wednesday evening.
We have got requests for slots from some wg's and BOFs. We still miss some.
The following wg's / BOFs have been scheduled in the preliminary track
(which is still not official). Keith and I have scheduled groups that we
either have got request from, groups that will meet according to what we
guess, or groups that _should_ meet to either close or move significantlly
IF it is the case that you ARE on this list, but do NOT want a meeting, let
us know. Also, if you are NOT on this list, but WANT a meeting, let us know.
We will have approx 2 parallell tracks, but we have divided the wg's into
web, directory and message meetings. We are trying not to make wgs from
each one of these groups collide. It is also the case that we have tried
(for obvious reasons) move the meetings so neither Keith nor I have
meetings in two of "our" wgs at the same time.
But, hurry up! The track will soon be submitted.
After that has happened, only minor changes can be made.
------- End of Forwarded Message