Below is an issue list for the informational document. I do not think any of these issues are wildly controversial. However, the decision on whether to publish this document should not depend on whether it is controversial, but whether we think it might be useful to future developers. Even if the first developers, who were probably the most knowledgeable groups, did not use the document much, future developers might gain from it.
Section in Issue description this draft
4 Should some more method of communication between html viewer and e-mail program be described? Are the methods correctly described?
5 Are there any more problems with rewriting URIs which should be described in section 5?
8 Is it OK to say that senders should not assume that recipients will show the value of Content-Description inside Multipart/Related (since HTML has other methods of showing this, for example the <CAPTION> element?
9 Should we recommend Multipart/related as done in section 9?
9 Section 9 describes two ways of using Multipart/alternative, 9.1 with Multipart/alternative inside Multipart/related, and 9.2 with Multipart/alternative outside Multipart/related.
Note: I have tested with a few existing mailers. Eudora 4.0.1 puts multipart/related outside multipart/alternative, Netscape puts multipart/alternative outside multipart/related. I did not know how to put images into a message with Outlook Express, so I am not sure how it would handle this.
The advantage with multipart/related outside, as Eudora does it, is that the image will be shown to recipients whose mailers can handle attachments but not html.
Should we recommend support for both alternatives or for only one of them?
10 Is the description of pros and cons of mailto versus http ACTION element in forms OK?
11 Section 11 contains the figure which was removed from the standard, because people said it was not correct, but which I feel described the character encoding issues better than the text in the standard. If, however, the figure is still incorrect, we should perhaps remove that section?
12 Is the description about conversion from HTTP to MIME correct?
13 Is the new section 13 on default font size correct? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jacob Palme <[log in to unmask]> (Stockholm University and KTH) for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme Between 26-31 June use phone No. +46-8-664 77 48 not +46-8-16 16 67
|