Content-Type: text/html

I agree with Jay -- Parallel implies concomitancy, with simultaneous
and possbily synchronized presention of multiple streams of data.

So, multipart/related is the more general type for various structural
relationships.

Cheers...\Stef

From your message Mon, 8 Jul 1996 21:34:21 -0400:
}
}In a message dated 96-07-08 21:18:23 EDT, <a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind9607%26L%3DMHTML%26E%3D0%26P%3D60172%26B%3D--%26T%3Dtext%252Fplain%3B%2520charset%3Dus-ascii" >[log in to unmask]</a> (Pete
}Resnick) writes:
}
}> As we discussed privately, the semantics of "multipart/related" seems more
}>  like the parts refering to eachother as against simply being "a bunch of
}>  things that belong together". I think perhaps "multipart/parallel" has the
}>  latter semantics.
}
}I think multipart/parallel would be something video and audio that are
}supposed to play simultaneously, though in reality you'd need some third part
}that told you how to choreograph the first two.
}
}Jay